<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PwdHash now Firefox 3 Compatible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automaticable.com/2008-06-16/pwdhash-now-firefox-3-compatible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automaticable.com/2008-06-16/pwdhash-now-firefox-3-compatible/</link>
	<description>adjective: of or pertaining to things that should work but go awry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Introducing: Pwdhash Sharp 0.8.4! &#124; automaticable</title>
		<link>http://www.automaticable.com/2008-06-16/pwdhash-now-firefox-3-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Introducing: Pwdhash Sharp 0.8.4! &#124; automaticable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automaticable.com/?p=308#comment-500</guid>
		<description>[...] the PwdHash Firefox extention wasn&#8217;t compatible with Firefox 3 (although they&#8217;ve updated the addon since then), so that was another reason I needed an alternative.  Pwdhash Sharp is also convenient for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the PwdHash Firefox extention wasn&#8217;t compatible with Firefox 3 (although they&#8217;ve updated the addon since then), so that was another reason I needed an alternative.  Pwdhash Sharp is also convenient for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

