<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psuedo-science: Planes on a treadmill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automaticable.com/2008-01-31/psuedo-science-planes-on-a-treadmill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automaticable.com/2008-01-31/psuedo-science-planes-on-a-treadmill/</link>
	<description>adjective: of or pertaining to things that should work but go awry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Wegner</title>
		<link>http://www.automaticable.com/2008-01-31/psuedo-science-planes-on-a-treadmill/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Wegner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automaticable.com/2008/01/31/psuedo-science-planes-on-a-treadmill/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>I thought the EXACT same thing when I heard about this myth, and was throughly surprised when i figured out the answer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the EXACT same thing when I heard about this myth, and was throughly surprised when i figured out the answer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Wegner</title>
		<link>http://www.automaticable.com/2008-01-31/psuedo-science-planes-on-a-treadmill/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Wegner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.automaticable.com/2008/01/31/psuedo-science-planes-on-a-treadmill/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting question.  Before I read the comments and change my opinion, here&#039;s my thoughts:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So basically, what gives a plane lift is how its wings cut through the air.  The wings are tilted such that as they move forward in the air, it pushes the air down, and thus creates an equal force upwards.  You see the opposite when a plane goes to land-- the wings tilt up to push the air up and itself down, thus putting more pressure on the wheels to allow it to stop.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The moral, then, is that the plane needs  some wind in its face to fly.  Normally it creates it&#039;s own wind by jetting forward.  But if there&#039;s no forward motion, then there&#039;s no cutting the air, no equal and opposite force, and thus no flight.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now, let&#039;s see if I&#039;m right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting question.  Before I read the comments and change my opinion, here&#8217;s my thoughts:</p>
<p>So basically, what gives a plane lift is how its wings cut through the air.  The wings are tilted such that as they move forward in the air, it pushes the air down, and thus creates an equal force upwards.  You see the opposite when a plane goes to land&#8211; the wings tilt up to push the air up and itself down, thus putting more pressure on the wheels to allow it to stop.</p>
<p>The moral, then, is that the plane needs  some wind in its face to fly.  Normally it creates it&#8217;s own wind by jetting forward.  But if there&#8217;s no forward motion, then there&#8217;s no cutting the air, no equal and opposite force, and thus no flight.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s see if I&#8217;m right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

